Unpacking Software Livestream

Join our monthly Unpacking Software livestream to hear about the latest news, chat and opinion on packaging, software deployment and lifecycle management!

Learn More

Chocolatey Product Spotlight

Join the Chocolatey Team on our regular monthly stream where we put a spotlight on the most recent Chocolatey product releases. You'll have a chance to have your questions answered in a live Ask Me Anything format.

Learn More

Chocolatey Coding Livestream

Join us for the Chocolatey Coding Livestream, where members of our team dive into the heart of open source development by coding live on various Chocolatey projects. Tune in to witness real-time coding, ask questions, and gain insights into the world of package management. Don't miss this opportunity to engage with our team and contribute to the future of Chocolatey!

Learn More

Calling All Chocolatiers! Whipping Up Windows Automation with Chocolatey Central Management

Webinar from
Wednesday, 17 January 2024

We are delighted to announce the release of Chocolatey Central Management v0.12.0, featuring seamless Deployment Plan creation, time-saving duplications, insightful Group Details, an upgraded Dashboard, bug fixes, user interface polishing, and refined documentation. As an added bonus we'll have members of our Solutions Engineering team on-hand to dive into some interesting ways you can leverage the new features available!

Watch On-Demand
Chocolatey Community Coffee Break

Join the Chocolatey Team as we discuss all things Community, what we do, how you can get involved and answer your Chocolatey questions.

Watch The Replays
Chocolatey and Intune Overview

Webinar Replay from
Wednesday, 30 March 2022

At Chocolatey Software we strive for simple, and teaching others. Let us teach you just how simple it could be to keep your 3rd party applications updated across your devices, all with Intune!

Watch On-Demand
Chocolatey For Business. In Azure. In One Click.

Livestream from
Thursday, 9 June 2022

Join James and Josh to show you how you can get the Chocolatey For Business recommended infrastructure and workflow, created, in Azure, in around 20 minutes.

Watch On-Demand
The Future of Chocolatey CLI

Livestream from
Thursday, 04 August 2022

Join Paul and Gary to hear more about the plans for the Chocolatey CLI in the not so distant future. We'll talk about some cool new features, long term asks from Customers and Community and how you can get involved!

Watch On-Demand
Hacktoberfest Tuesdays 2022

Livestreams from
October 2022

For Hacktoberfest, Chocolatey ran a livestream every Tuesday! Re-watch Cory, James, Gary, and Rain as they share knowledge on how to contribute to open-source projects such as Chocolatey CLI.

Watch On-Demand

Downloads:

666

Downloads of v 2019.2.3.0:

57

Last Update:

06 Mar 2020

Package Maintainer(s):

Software Author(s):

  • Devolutions

Tags:

devolutions password hub manager cloud secure

Password Hub

Downloads:

666

Downloads of v 2019.2.3.0:

57

Software Author(s):

  • Devolutions

Password Hub

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

All Checks are Passing

3 Passing Tests


Validation Testing Passed


Verification Testing Passed

Details

Scan Testing Successful:

No detections found in any package files

Details
WARNING

This package was rejected on 13 Apr 2020. The reviewer chocolatey-ops has listed the following reason(s):

mlandry (maintainer) on 21 Jan 2020 16:41:52 +00:00:

User 'mlandry' (maintainer) submitted package.

mlandry (maintainer) on 21 Jan 2020 16:48:41 +00:00:

User 'mlandry' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 21 Jan 2020 17:23:41 +00:00:

password-hub has failed automated validation.

Requirements

Requirements represent the minimum quality of a package that is acceptable. When a package version has failed requirements, the package version requires fixing and/or response by the maintainer. Provided a Requirement has flagged correctly, it must be fixed before the package version can be approved. The exact same version should be uploaded during moderation review.

  • Comments from template should be cleaned up and removed. More...
Guidelines

Guidelines are strong suggestions that improve the quality of a package version. These are considered something to fix for next time to increase the quality of the package. Over time Guidelines can become Requirements. A package version can be approved without addressing Guideline comments but will reduce the quality of the package.

  • The nuspec has been enhanced to allow packageSourceUrl, pointing to the url where the package source resides. This is a strong guideline because it simplifies collaboration. Please add it to the nuspec. More...
  • Release Notes (releaseNotes) are a short description of changes in each version of a package. Please include releasenotes in the nuspec. NOTE: To prevent the need to continually update this field, providing a URL to an external list of Release Notes is perfectly acceptable. More...
Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The package maintainer field (owners) matches the software author field (authors) in the nuspec. The reviewer will ensure that the package maintainer is also the software author. More...
  • Binary files (.exe, .msi, .zip) have been included. The reviewer will ensure the maintainers have distribution rights. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 21 Jan 2020 17:49:47 +00:00:

password-hub has passed automated testing.
This is not the only check that is performed so check the package page to ensure a 'Ready' status.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/e4a52b2be8c4025c539229e1f9953af2 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

mlandry (maintainer) on 21 Jan 2020 18:00:29 +00:00:

User 'mlandry' (maintainer) submitted package.

mlandry (maintainer) on 21 Jan 2020 18:02:58 +00:00:

User 'mlandry' (maintainer) submitted package.

mlandry (maintainer) on 21 Jan 2020 18:16:32 +00:00:

User 'mlandry' (maintainer) submitted package.

mlandry (maintainer) on 21 Jan 2020 18:45:11 +00:00:

User 'mlandry' (maintainer) submitted package.

mlandry (maintainer) on 21 Jan 2020 18:47:18 +00:00:

User 'mlandry' (maintainer) submitted package.

mlandry (maintainer) on 21 Jan 2020 18:52:15 +00:00:

User 'mlandry' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 21 Jan 2020 19:27:36 +00:00:

password-hub has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The package maintainer field (owners) matches the software author field (authors) in the nuspec. The reviewer will ensure that the package maintainer is also the software author. More...
  • Binary files (.exe, .msi, .zip) have been included. The reviewer will ensure the maintainers have distribution rights. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 21 Jan 2020 21:23:25 +00:00:

password-hub has passed automated testing.
This is not the only check that is performed so check the package page to ensure a 'Ready' status.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/670adff68dd404837cf1327c4ae7b46e for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

gep13 (reviewer) on 23 Jan 2020 08:12:59 +00:00:

In the install script, if you aren't using the 32bit variables, then please remove them.

The checksum variable is empty, can you please either populate or remove this.

The beforemodidy script is empty, so please remove it from the package.

Why are you both downloading the file and also including it in the package?

The license and verification files haven't been completed correctly.

The uninstall script, as is, won't work properly. Can you please check this and verify.

mlandry (maintainer) on 23 Jan 2020 13:52:25 +00:00:

User 'mlandry' (maintainer) submitted package.

mlandry (maintainer) on 23 Jan 2020 13:54:11 +00:00:

User 'mlandry' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 23 Jan 2020 14:29:00 +00:00:

password-hub has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The package maintainer field (owners) matches the software author field (authors) in the nuspec. The reviewer will ensure that the package maintainer is also the software author. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 23 Jan 2020 14:38:18 +00:00:

password-hub has passed automated testing.
This is not the only check that is performed so check the package page to ensure a 'Ready' status.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/f78b10e1c4dfe66d3200d0d579ab228f for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

Pauby (reviewer) on 10 Feb 2020 13:42:13 +00:00:

As you are downloading the file from the remote source you will need a checksum and checksumType.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 01 Mar 2020 13:44:11 +00:00:

We've found password-hub v2019.2.3.0 in a submitted status and waiting for your next actions. It has had no updates for 20 or more days since a reviewer has asked for corrections. Please note that if there is no response or fix of the package within 15 days of this message, this package version will automatically be closed (rejected) due to being stale.

Take action:

  • Log in to the site and respond to the review comments.
  • Resubmit fixes for this version.
  • If the package version is failing automated checks, you can self-reject the package.

If your package is failing automated testing, you can use the chocolatey test environment to manually run the verification and determine what may need to be fixed.

Note: We don't like to see packages automatically rejected. It doesn't mean that we don't value your contributions, just that we can not continue to hold packages versions in a waiting status that have possibly been abandoned. If you don't believe you will be able to fix up this version of the package within 15 days, we strongly urge you to log in to the site and respond to the review comments until you are able to.

atessier (maintainer) on 06 Mar 2020 14:48:56 +00:00:

User 'atessier' (maintainer) submitted package.

atessier (maintainer) on 06 Mar 2020 14:50:48 +00:00:

User 'atessier' (maintainer) submitted package.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 06 Mar 2020 15:26:27 +00:00:

password-hub has passed automated validation. It may have or may still fail other checks like testing (verification).
NOTE: No required changes that the validator checks have been flagged! It is appreciated if you fix other items, but only Requirements will hold up a package version from approval. A human review could still turn up issues a computer may not easily find.

Notes

Notes typically flag things for both you and the reviewer to go over. Sometimes this is the use of things that may or may not be necessary given the constraints of what you are trying to do and/or are harder for automation to flag for other reasons. Items found in Notes might be Requirements depending on the context. A package version can be approved without addressing Note comments.

  • The package maintainer field (owners) matches the software author field (authors) in the nuspec. The reviewer will ensure that the package maintainer is also the software author. More...

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 06 Mar 2020 16:50:59 +00:00:

password-hub has passed automated testing.
This is not the only check that is performed so check the package page to ensure a 'Ready' status.
Please visit https://gist.github.com/a80e6cbe2745f120eeda116345e5d294 for details.
This is an FYI only. There is no action you need to take.

flcdrg (reviewer) on 09 Mar 2020 03:18:23 +00:00:

Please resolve these to allow this package to be approved:

  • If you are the software author, please confirm that via a comment here. Alternatively, if you are not the software author, put your own name in the owners field.

thanks,
David

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 29 Mar 2020 03:18:25 +00:00:

We've found password-hub v2019.2.3.0 in a submitted status and waiting for your next actions. It has had no updates for 20 or more days since a reviewer has asked for corrections. Please note that if there is no response or fix of the package within 15 days of this message, this package version will automatically be closed (rejected) due to being stale.

Take action:

  • Log in to the site and respond to the review comments.
  • Resubmit fixes for this version.
  • If the package version is failing automated checks, you can self-reject the package.

If your package is failing automated testing, you can use the chocolatey test environment to manually run the verification and determine what may need to be fixed.

Note: We don't like to see packages automatically rejected. It doesn't mean that we don't value your contributions, just that we can not continue to hold packages versions in a waiting status that have possibly been abandoned. If you don't believe you will be able to fix up this version of the package within 15 days, we strongly urge you to log in to the site and respond to the review comments until you are able to.

chocolatey-ops (reviewer) on 13 Apr 2020 03:19:40 +00:00:

Unfortunately there has not been progress to move password-hub v2019.2.3.0 towards an approved status within 15 days after the last review message, so we need to close (reject) the package version at this time. If you want to pick this version up and move it towards approval in the future, use the contact site admins link on the package page and we can move it back into a submitted status so you can submit updates.

Status Change - Changed status of package from 'submitted' to 'rejected'.

Description

Controlled by IT pros and loved by business users, Devolutions Password Hub is a secure and cloud-based password manager for teams. It empowers your organization to easily and securely vault and manage business-user passwords, along with other sensitive information, through a user-friendly web interface that can be quickly, easily and securely accessed via any browser. Simply put, Devolutions Password Hub is the perfect balance of security and usability.


tools\chocolateyinstall.ps1
$ErrorActionPreference = 'Stop';
$toolsDir   = "$(Split-Path -parent $MyInvocation.MyCommand.Definition)"
$url        = 'https://cdn.devolutions.net/download/Setup.Devolutions.PasswordHubDesktop.2019.2.3.0.exe'

$packageArgs = @{
  packageName   = $env:ChocolateyPackageName
  unzipLocation = $toolsDir
  fileType      = 'exe'
  url           = $url
  softwareName  = 'password-hub*'
  checksum      = '482F1803B6FBDAC533ACB94E7907AADAAA0C7D38B7EDB6A862D9397F370AD9E1'
  checksumType  = 'sha256'
  checksumType64= 'sha256'

  silentArgs    = "/qn /norestart /l*v `"$($env:TEMP)\$($packageName).$($env:chocolateyPackageVersion).MsiInstall.log`""
  validExitCodes= @(0, 3010, 1641)
}

Install-ChocolateyPackage @packageArgs










    









Log in or click on link to see number of positives.

In cases where actual malware is found, the packages are subject to removal. Software sometimes has false positives. Moderators do not necessarily validate the safety of the underlying software, only that a package retrieves software from the official distribution point and/or validate embedded software against official distribution point (where distribution rights allow redistribution).

Chocolatey Pro provides runtime protection from possible malware.

Add to Builder Version Downloads Last Updated Status

This package has no dependencies.

Discussion for the Password Hub Package

Ground Rules:

  • This discussion is only about Password Hub and the Password Hub package. If you have feedback for Chocolatey, please contact the Google Group.
  • This discussion will carry over multiple versions. If you have a comment about a particular version, please note that in your comments.
  • The maintainers of this Chocolatey Package will be notified about new comments that are posted to this Disqus thread, however, it is NOT a guarantee that you will get a response. If you do not hear back from the maintainers after posting a message below, please follow up by using the link on the left side of this page or follow this link to contact maintainers. If you still hear nothing back, please follow the package triage process.
  • Tell us what you love about the package or Password Hub, or tell us what needs improvement.
  • Share your experiences with the package, or extra configuration or gotchas that you've found.
  • If you use a url, the comment will be flagged for moderation until you've been whitelisted. Disqus moderated comments are approved on a weekly schedule if not sooner. It could take between 1-5 days for your comment to show up.
comments powered by Disqus